PDA

View Full Version : DoD Directive 1325.6


HMC-FMF-PJ
11-03-2006, 03:10
Department of Defense
DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1325.6
October 1, 1996, Certified Current as of December 1, 2003

SUBJECT: Guidelines for Handling Dissident and Protest Activities Among Members of the Armed Forces

References:
(a) DoD Directive 1325.6, subject as above, September 12, 1969 (hereby canceled)
(b) Chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, "Uniform Code of Military Justice"
(c) Title 18, United States Code
(d) DoD Directive 1334.1, "Wearing of the Uniform," August 11, 1969
(e) Title 10, United States Code

1. REISSUANCE AND PURPOSE
This Directive reissues reference (a) to update DoD policy and responsibilities governing the handling of dissident activities by members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps. Specific problems should be resolved only on the basis of the particular facts of the situation and in accordance with the provisions of applicable DoD regulations and reference (b).

2. APPLICABILITY
This Directive applies to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments (including the Coast Guard when it is operating as a Military Service in the Navy), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities (hereafter referred to collectively as "the DoD Components"). The term "Military Services," as used herein, refers to the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps.

3. POLICY
It is DoD policy that:

3.1. The Department of Defense shall safeguard the security of the United States.

3.2. The Service members' right of expression should be preserved to the maximum extent possible, consistent with good order and discipline and the national security.

3.3. No commander should be indifferent to conduct that, if allowed to proceed unchecked, would destroy the effectiveness of his or her unit.

3.4. The proper balancing of these interests will depend largely upon the calm and prudent judgment of the responsible commander.

3.5. The following guidelines be applied to principal activities that the Armed Forces have encountered:

3.5.1. Possession and Distribution of Printed Materials

3.5.1.1. A commander is not authorized to prohibit the distribution of a specific issue of a publication distributed through official outlets such as post exchanges and military libraries. In the case of distribution of publications through other than official outlets, commanders may require that prior approval be obtained for any distribution on a military installation to determine whether there is a clear danger to the loyalty, discipline, or morale of military personnel, or if the distribution of the publication would materially interfere with the accomplishment of a military mission. Distribution of any publication determined to be a danger in any of these areas shall be prohibited.

3.5.1.2. While the mere possession of unauthorized printed material may not be prohibited, printed material that is prohibited from distribution shall be impounded if the commander determines that an attempt will be made to distribute.

3.5.1.3. The fact that a publication is critical of government policies or officials is not, in itself, a ground on which distribution may be prohibited.

3.5.2. Off-Post Gathering Places. Commanders have the authority to place establishments "off-limits" in accordance with established procedures when, for example, the activities taking place there include counseling members to refuse to perform duty or to desert; pose a significant adverse effect on Service members' health, morale, or welfare; or otherwise present a clear danger to the loyalty, discipline, or morale of a member or military unit.

3.5.3. Servicemen Organizations. Commanders are not authorized to recognize or to bargain with any union representing or seeking recognition to represent Service members.

3.5.4. Publication of "Underground Newspapers." Personal writing for publication may not be pursued during duty hours, or accomplished by the use of Government or non-appropriated fund property on- or off-duty. While publication of "underground newspapers" by military personnel off-post, on their own time, and with their own money and equipment, is not prohibited, if such a publication contains language the utterance of which is punishable under Federal law, those involved in the printing, publication, or distribution may be disciplined for such infractions.

3.5.5. On-Post Demonstrations and Similar Activities. The commander of a military installation or other military controlled facility under the jurisdiction of the United States shall prohibit any demonstration or activity on the installation or facility that could result in interference with or prevention of orderly accomplishment of the mission of the installation or facility, or present a clear danger to loyalty, discipline, or morale of the troops. It is a crime for any person to enter a military reservation for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulations, or for any person to enter or re-enter an installation after having been barred by order of the commander under 18 U.S.C. 1382 (reference (c)).

3.5.6. Off-Post Demonstrations by Members. Members of the Armed Forces are prohibited from participating in off-post demonstrations when they are on-duty, in a foreign country, when their activities constitute a breach of law and order, when violence is likely to result, or when they are in uniform in violation of DoD Directive 1334.1 (reference (d)).

3.5.7. Grievances. The right of members to complain and request redress of grievances against actions of their commanders is protected by Article 138 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (reference (b)). In addition, a member may petition or present any grievance to any Member of Congress or an Inspector General under 10 U.S.C. 1034 (reference (e)). An open door policy for complaints is a basic principle of good leadership, and commanders should personally ensure that adequate procedures exist for identifying valid complaints and taking corrective action.

3.5.8. Prohibited Activities. Military personnel must reject participation in organizations that espouse supremacist causes; attempt to create illegal discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex, religion, or national origin; advocate the use of force or violence; or otherwise engage in efforts to deprive individuals of their civil rights. Active participation, such as publicly demonstrating or rallying, fund raising, recruiting and training members, organizing or leading such organizations, or otherwise engaging in activities in relation to such organizations or in furtherance of the objectives of such organizations that are viewed by command to be detrimental to the good order, discipline, or mission accomplishment of the unit, is incompatible with Military Service, and is, therefore, prohibited. Commanders have authority to employ the full range of administrative procedures, including separation or appropriate disciplinary action, against military personnel who actively participate in such groups. Functions of command include vigilance about the existence of such activities; active use of investigative authority to include a prompt and fair complaint process; and use of administrative powers, such as counseling, reprimands, orders, and performance evaluations to deter such activities. Military Departments shall ensure that this policy on prohibited activities is included in initial active duty training, pre-commissioning training, professional military education, commander training, and other appropriate Service training programs.

4. RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall:

4.1.1. Develop overall policy and guidelines for handling dissident and protest activities among members of the Armed Forces.

4.1.2. Approve policies and procedures developed by the Secretaries of the Military Departments that implement this Directive.

4.2. The Secretaries of the Military Departments shall:

4.2.1. Establish policies and procedures to implement this Directive within their respective Departments.

4.2.2. Ensure compliance with the training requirements set out in subparagraph 3.5.8., above.

5. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Directive is effective immediately.



E1. ENCLOSURE 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS RELEVANT TO HANDLING OF DISSIDENT AND PROTEST ACTIVITIES IN THE ARMED FORCES

E1.1. CONSTITUTION
The First Amendment, U.S. Constitution, provides as follows:

Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


E1.2. STATUTORY PROVISIONS
E1.2.1. Applicable to All Persons

E1.2.1.1. 18 U.S.C. Section 1381, reference (c) -- Enticing desertion and harboring deserters.

E1.2.1.2. Section 2385 -- Advocating overthrow of the Government.

E1.2.1.3. Section 2387 -- Counseling insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty.

E1.2.1.4. Section 2388 -- Causing or attempting to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty during war.

E1.2.2. Applicable to Members of the Armed Forces

E1.2.2.1. 10 U.S.C. Section 917, reference (e), (Article 117, UCMJ) -- Provoking speeches or gestures.

E1.2.2.2. Section 882 (Article 82, UCMJ) -- Soliciting desertion, mutiny, sedition, or misbehavior before the enemy.

E1.2.2.3. Section 904 (Article 104, UCMJ) -- Aiding the enemy.

E1.2.2.4. Section 901 (Article 101, UCMJ) -- Improper use of a countersign.

E1.2.2.5. Section 888 (Article 88, UCMJ) -- Contemptuous words by commissioned officers against certain officials.

E1.2.2.6. Section 889 (Article 89, UCMJ) -- Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer.

E1.2.2.7. Section 891 (Article 91, UCMJ) -- Insubordinate conduct toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer.

E1.2.2.8. Section 892 (Article 92, UCMJ) -- Failure to obey order or regulation.

E1.2.2.9. Section 934 (Article 134, UCMJ) -- Uttering disloyal statement, criminal libel, communicating a threat, and soliciting another to commit an offense.

puckmedic
11-03-2006, 08:05
In case any one was wondering whether or not PATRIOT GUARD RIDERS was considered a "protest group" we are not. Protest groups usually have some political or religious agenda. PGR simply rides and stands in HONOR of our fallen service members, police and firefighters, and does so at the invitation of the family and next of kin. We are INVITED GUESTS and conduct ourselves accordingly , even in the face of protestors.



We are at Fort cambell every month at the base commader's request for the monthly memorial services for the 101st airborne killed since the last month's service.

The protestors show up and are denied access to the base despite legal moves to attempt entry. I have had several inquiries as to the legal status of an active duty member being PGR, so this was a good chance to bring it full circle.

No C O anywhere will ever disallow you the privledge of standing in memory for a fallen service member. At least none that are worth a damn. By the instruction, I don't see how they could. If they ever do, let me know, I'll open discussion with him or her.

HMC-FMF-PJ
11-03-2006, 21:43
PGR is definitely a command endorsed group

For whatever reason though, individuals (especially those who grew up with a computer in the house) tend to allow their fingers to forget that the person sitting behind the keyboard is in the military and realistically subject to disciplinary actions for the things they type.

The same brain that knows he would be slammed if he walked up to a superior and mouthed-off, somehow feels free to unleash their fury when posting a rant on a website. Guess what? It is the same thing. It does not matter if you do it in person, on camera, or online; inappropriate and unprofessional conduct can cost you stripes and even put you in the brig. (Yes, people have been court martialed for things they have publicly posted.)

A word of advice to anyone planning to make a career of the military is to always ensure their public posts would not sink their ship if someone taped a copy of it to the CO's door. (It happens) You should also have the mindset that words released on the internet are forever. In August an old friend forwarded me a copy of an email I had sent back in 1991 and I can readily find posts I made over a decade ago. A boss finding an old post can screw up a job just as fast as a significant other finding a stash of ancient love letters from an ex-love interest can screw upa relationship.

Da-Chief
11-03-2006, 22:55
Ditto..

Thanks!
HMC

puckmedic
11-05-2006, 07:14
That is true. I had a guy in Guam go to Captain's mast for an email!!! The person he sent it too thought it was funny and sent it around. One person felt it was wrong and filed the charge sheet.

Inappropiate key board use? Well, I was guilty of it a few times myself. Of course, I've always been an opinionated individual. Like I need to tell anyone here that.

Wrong words, wrong format, wrong intent. You want to see plenty of examples find myspace and check out some of the opinions tossed out there by sailors in groups like "U.S. Navy"

Some of the pictures, like the one of the girl kissing another girl (both in uniform!!!) on their personal pages are enough to send them packing. Today's sailor, more technologically advanced but lacking certain self preservation skills, have hit the internet and feel this is just a 8 hr job.

Speaking of jobs-- CCA is another place one must not voice opinions. My partner was assaulted two nights ago by an inmate. I later said "If it had been me, the fool would have been sucking food through a straw for six weeks." Heat of the moment etc and in line with what others said outside in the parking lot after work. however, I said it on the clock to the shift Captain. guess who walked in last night and had to sign a PSN (Problem Summary Notification, like a counseling chit) ?

Luckily I never said it when they were there with the video camera filming the take down and escort to the hole.

Partner is ok, she has a bit of a bruise on her cheek, said she's ben hit harder by girls.

I live in awalled and fenced in world surrounded by stupid people who act like children and can turn violent quickly over nothing. Lucky for me, I can defend myself til I quit breathing.